Ford Ranger Raptor Tow Review

There has been a lot of discussion / criticism about the towing ability of the Ford Ranger Raptor because of the reduced towing capacity specified by the manufacturer over the rest of the Ranger range.

I’ve towed 1500KG with the Raptor for a combined distance of over 1,000km in the last month.  And I’ve towed the same weight with a 3.2L Ford Ranger XLT, which gives me a good understanding of how the Raptor performs vs the traditional leaf sprung ute.

Here’s what I found personally when towing with the Raptor.

What I towed for the test

The Raptor and Track Trailer Tvan (at the Melbourne Show)

For the test, I towed a 2019 Track Trailer T-Van Mk5, which was loaded with equipment for us to exhibit at a range of shows around Sydney.  It would have been close to GTM of 1,500KG based on my calculations.

I also had personal gear in the Raptor, weighing approximately 100KG.

The type of driving done

For this towing test, I covered over 1,000km in the Raptor.  All travel done was on-road, or on graded unsealed roads.  My reflections will compare the experience to that of a 1,000km drive in a Ford Ranger XLT with the 3.2L.

Starting with the numbers

The Ford Ranger Raptor has the following specs:

GCM 5350 KG

GVM 3090 KG

Kerb Weight 2332 KG

Payload 758 KG

Towing capacity at full payload (assuming towball download @ 10% of towed weight): 2,260KG

Payload at full towing capacity (Ball weight must be subtracted from this): 518 KG

As is the standard with utes these days, the GCM is not the sum of the payload + Kerb weight + towing capacity, which means that at max towing capacity you must reduce the payload to 518KG.  Or at full payload of 758KG, max towing weight is 2,260KG.

My Experience

The 2.0L

There is no doubt that the decision on the 2.0L bi-turbo has divided people.  On paper, the 2.0L produces more power and more torque than the 3.2, which is no doubt why Ford chose it for the Raptor.  Many people still expect that the smaller motor won’t last as long as the bigger one, although this remains to be seen.

I’ve heard that the 2.0L bi-turbo was originally designed for use in the European Ford Transit commercial vehicle and sold for a number of years there prior to being introduced to Australia. Commercial vans have a hard life, so maybe this will turn into a non-issue?

Peak torque is produced in a very similar rev range for both engines (albeit with the new 2.0L pipping the 3.2 with 30 extra Newtons of twisting power). The key difference is where Max Power is produced, which for the 2.0L is somewhere in the vicinity of 3750 RPM, and where for the 3.2L it is at the 3000 RPM mark.

The bi-turbo though has a 10 speed gearbox, which works to keep the engine in its peak torque range.  I found that with the extra gears, the 10 speed generally keeps the Raptor in the 1500 to 2500 RPM space, where the 3.2L with the 6 speed uses a bit more of the rev range.

Even when you put the foot down, unless you choose sports mode the 10 speed keeps the engine producing peak torque, which is a very healthy 500Nm.  The downside of this is that the 2.0L doesn’t make quite the same noise as the 3.2 because it doesn’t drive the same way through the rev range.

I think that this is likely a key reason that the 2.0L doesn’t get the same reaction from people rather than because of actual performance.  In my experience towing with the Raptor, it powered up all of the hills I drove, maintaining the speed limit everywhere I drove, even up long winding hills. In the test, I drove around Sydney, ranging from Narellan to the Blue Mountains, and Newcastle, so I got my share of hills in!

The 140KG towball downweight didn’t negatively affect the stance of the Raptor

Gear shifting remained smooth at all times, I didn’t notice any excess engine noise, and the additional weight didn’t trouble the Raptor in any way at any point of the test.

The other thing with the 10 speed was that it seemed to know what gear to stay in at all times. It didn’t rush to get to the top gear and never felt like some diesels do where you can tell the gear is labouring the engine. It worked to keep the engine where it needed to be at all times. Even the few times up longer hills where it dropped gears felt very considered and deliberate, and that meant it never went from 1500 RPM to 3500RPM in a gear change either!

Cabin noise was minimal – at one point I had a few passengers who all commented on how quiet the ride was.  This is thanks to the Acoustic windscreens which I believe are now standard across the range.

Based on my experience, the engine was well matched to the vehicle and delivered plenty of power and torque for the weight towed.

The feel of the Trailer

Regardless of what I’ve towed the T-van with, the truth is at 1,500KG you notice the trailer when you first hitch it on.  However, you soon get used to the tow vehicle overcoming the initial inertia and getting the vehicle moving, and before long you get used to the additional weight.  The Raptor was no exception.  It wasn’t too long before I found myself checking the trailer was still attached because of the ease at which it towed. This was consistent with my experience driving the 3.2L XLT recently.

I did find that I could feel the trailer being pulled by the Raptor over the XLT.  If I hit a decent bump, I’d feel the trailer responding to it in the Raptor, but not the XLT.  I put this down to the suspension – the XLT has stiffer leaf springs in the rear, where the Raptor has high performance coil springs with Fox shocks. 

If you head off-road, the softer coil springs in the rear are amazing, and everyone in our team that has driven the Raptor will talk about how composed it is and how fast you can drive it over difficult terrain.  However, this feel is the consequence of having the better off-road bias – you’ll feel the trailer a bit more on-road.

Let me clarify though, that I didn’t find that the additional feel in the trailer was a bad thing, just something different from the stiffer leaf springs.

The Raptor at Show Your Dirt

Fuel Economy

In the Raptor, towing 1,500KG, I averaged 11.8L/100KM over the 1000+Km I drove.  I was very impressed with this result, because I maintained highway speeds wherever I was legally allowed.  With an 80L fuel tank, this gives you a technical range of about 670KM, meaning a planning range of about 600KM.

In the 3.2L I’m pretty sure I was at about 13.0L/100KM, which means you’d be looking at about 550km per tank.

How good does the new Club 4X4 wrap look?

My Verdict

After having driven over 6,000km with the Tvan in the last few months, and over 1,000 km each in the Ford Ranger XLT and now the Raptor as well, I think that the Ranger Raptor is actually a very capable tow vehicle. And so is the Ranger XLT.

So would I take a Raptor over the more traditional leaf sprung utes like the XLT?  The honest answer here is that it depends on what you are towing, and what type of travelling you intend to do.

If you intend to get off the beaten track, I’d go for the Raptor any day.  It is hugely capable off-road, and while the softer suspension means you will feel the trailer a bit more when on-road, off-road the Raptor is more comfortable than any other ute I’ve driven and you’ll enjoy the benefit of the additional capability vs the standard ute.  If you are in this bucket too, chances are that you aren’t going to be towing a behemoth of a trailer or van, so the reduced 2.5T max towing capacity won’t be an issue.

If you intend on sticking to outback highways, then while the Raptor is more than capable of meeting your needs, you’ll probably be that bit more comfortable in a leaf sprung ute like the XLT.  And you may appreciate the extra towing capacity as a result.

So to summarise, in my experience I think that the Raptor is a very capable tow vehicle.  The 2.0L was different to the 3.2L but performed very well and was well suited to the vehicle, especially with the 10 speed gearbox.  If you are looking for off-road capability, I think that the Raptor is hard to go past, although if on-road is going to be your bread and butter, you’ll find a leaf sprung ute like the XLT slightly more comfortable on-road due to the stiffer back end.

We’ve got the Ranger Raptor for the next 18 months. We’ll continue to provide updates on how it performs, how it handles the huge km’s we put on it, and how you might be able to make the best Off-road ute produced by a manufacturer even better.

Aiden

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Comments 16

  1. Nice review.

    I wonder though, after all of the billions of dollars that has gone into the vehicle R&D over the years, has it been worth it?
    We are only just back from a six week cruise around South Aus, pulling a T-van in our 26 year old GQ shortie TD42. Average fuel consumption over the 6050 kilometres was 11.8 litres per 100k.

    Seriously, has the R&D been worth it, and how far have we really come?

  2. In the real world Rangers are being used to pull much larger vans in the range of 2.5 to 3t legally or not. It’s a shame your tow test of both models was only based on a lighter weighted van which could easily be towed by most other utes on the market.

    1. Post
      Author

      Hi Phil, our intent was to look specifically at towing with the Raptor, which has a lower than normal towing capacity. Others have said the suspension is too soft to row with. The Ranger definitely can tow 3T if you reduce payload slightly, and does it well, just not the Raptor variant!

  3. Clearly they are designed for different uses, so you will buy the one which suits your needs best.
    Or are people complaining they have too much choice now?
    One is a truck & the other is a sports ute, but you can blur the lines if required.
    Perhaps you could actually weigh the units fully loaded to give a more accurate picture.
    After all, isn’t that what Club4x4 have been banking on about?

    1. Post
      Author

      Thanks for the comment Hooksy. Fair point – We will get the trailer and vehicle weighed and let you know the outcome…

      1. Hi Aiden,
        I am stuck in this situation and would really appreciate the help with your current set up.
        Could you please do a test with 400 kg in the back of the Raptor with the trailer on !
        This is roughly my pay load when we go camping and l pull a 1200kg off road trailer.
        I would really like to see the photo’s of how the Raptor sits with this load and if there is any lost steering weight !
        No one has done this test yet and published the weights!
        As said before, isn’t this what its really all about!
        Alternatively, l buy a Wildtrack and have to spend money upgrading the suspension to suit our off road requirements !
        Looking forward to your opinion in this matter.
        Tim

  4. I was wondering if the raptor would be able to accommodate a couple of air bags out back to help with the extra sag and carrying ability while towing then deflate while you 4wd or just general use??

  5. The XLT is the big pay load tow vehicle,which i use to tow my 2.6 ton van with ease.
    the raptor was made to be a full off road vehicle,which really only needs to tow the 4wd camper trailers.But using two turbo’s to get the power out of a smaller motor i can’t see lasting .That’s why it has the 10 speed auto instead of the 6 speed so it’s not reving hard.
    But it is what your needs are that choices the vehicle.

  6. It would also be interesting to load both the xlt in the 3.2 and 2.0 litre variant to the gcm of 6000 kg and do the test again to see the difference when towing the maximum allowable.

    1. Post
      Author
      1. Hi Aiden what about the issue of chassis bend which al but the Land Cruisers have if you don’t strengthen the chassis because none of them are suitable for air bags if there is a bent chassis like the really bad Titans
        Cheers Masson Fox

        1. Post
          Author

          Hi Masson, unfortunately I’ve seen Landcruiser chassis bend too! I think we see a bit less of it because they have a bigger payload capacity than many other utes, but I suspect most of them on any make are caused by overloading… the Raptor has a strengthened chassis over the std Ranger.

  7. I’d be interested to know how the Raptor goes towing 2T on a high 30’s (38 – 40 deg) day up the hills between Cann River and Eden. I had the prev model 2.5L STX Navara which was OK towing in the high 20’s in this region but cracked it at 39 deg, engine went into limp mode. It was due to the exhaust gas temp sensor, Nissan couldn’t fix it. I wasn’t trying to maintain 100k couldn’t anyway, but was using about 3/4 throttle at about 80Kmh. I think the Raptor will do better due to the 10 speed gearbox but I believe this would be a great test for all tow vehicles.
    I have moved to the Q7 / Touareg V8 engine 800Nm diesel – no problem even at 100Kmh.

  8. Great summary comparing the two vehicles in similar circumstances and distance.
    Was the ride and comfort level the same in both vehicles with the Raptor’s suspension and different seating as I have read elsewhere that the Raptor is an enjoyable tourer due to its handling.
    Thankyou

    1. Hey Andrew,

      Not sure about Aiden, i’m sure he will chime in here – i have the pleasure of driving the Raptor daily and have to say it handles more like a well sorted SUV than a utility. The coil sprung rear means you don’t get the inherent “bounciness” of a leaf sprung setup you commonly find in a goods carrying vehicle and it really belies the size and heft of the unit.

      It is quite softly sprung, but it does have progressive coils which means things firm up with more load. This difference is what leads to the lower towing capacity, but i can tell you with 100% certainty it is a supremely comfortable thing to drive everyday and the seats are superb.

      Having driven the Wildtrack – the comfort levels inside are similar, but ultimately a different beast for different duties.

      You really ought to take one for a drive.

      Kal

    2. Post
      Author

      G’day Andrew,

      Kalen has summed it up pretty well. The ride is quite different in both, due to the suspension. The Raptor was a more comfortable drive, both on and off-road, although when towing I felt the trailer more due to the suspension. Personally, I think the Raptor would make a brilliant tourer, as long as you aren’t towing anything over about 2T.

      Go and take both for a drive!

      Regards,

      Aiden

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *